Bluray x264 vs x265. Kong (eng) Movie Rating: 6.

Bluray x264 vs x265 They run on the CPU. Click me -x264 (10900 kb/s) vs x265 (3931 kb/s)-Keep in mind that the x265 was actually transcoded from the x264 (the x264 is the source) so it's not really a fair comparison but even so I'm happy with the result. 264 Blu-ray can export chapter information, whereas H. The x265 is going to be the smallest file; it's the most efficient trade off between size and quality. The bit rates currently are in excess of 40mbps on x264 High Profile L4. 265 codecs. Nothing can be better than the source, but getting close to source quality with fewer bits is what x265 has done for me. 264 cannot. On the contrary, X264 is an encoder for H. I can reduce the storage space taken by half per series by going for x265. Upvote Translate. Both have good compression rates, h265 being the better of the 2, but the caveat is that transcoding h265 is a bit more CPU Originally Posted by acejh1987 /t/1448583/can-you-tell-the-difference-between-a-blu-ray-and-a-x264-copy#post_22768042 No - There is a difference, you just are not able to see it like some others can, just like some 32 mbps is enough to look good and you won’t really notice much of a difference. I did a side-by-side comparison using x264 CRF20 Medium (all other settings at default) and the same thing with NVENC H265 at QP 24 The Trash guides have very detailed custom format/profile guides. 1080p x264 and 2160p x265. 5-4GB in x264 you wouldnt notice difference also. My question is the following: I understand that h265 10bit handles better compression, how about the video quality? My priority has always x265 has a bit smaller filesizes (~30% or so), but require more CPU to decode and is less widely available on media players (smart TVs etc. There are multiple encoders for H. I compared x264 720p files with x265 1080p files and there was no contest. Predator: Requiem Blu-ray Release Date April 15, 2008 (Extreme Unrated Set). Is that correct? Votes. 264 and H. It is consistent with what google tell us about VMAF:"Real Networks wrote a white paper in the subject and they found that VMAF 93 is a good value to target, but everything with an average over 90 will look good. X265 is a software that encodes video files into the H. 83GB and the x265 is 3. x265 these days. Also for rom com, dramas, etc. x264 on the other hand starts to wash out the scene pretty severely, smearing out some x265 vs. Show Printable Version; Email this Page; Subscribe to this Thread; Thread. Right!)). x265 likes sharp, clear video - if you feed it a This article aims to clarify the distinctions between H265 and x265, explore their functionalities, and discuss their implications for users and content creators alike. BDRip - Encoded from the remux It also produces the same result no matter how many threads you use, which is not the case for x264 or x265 unless the situation has changed a lot recently. X264 is supported by virtually all devices, even very old player and cpu. For DVD/Bluray rips, I tend to use software encoding too unless I am in a huge hurry for some reason. Step 5. so if you aim to have higher bitrate than 3Mbps, better to use x264 for wider client hardware support. Follow; Report; x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Original file is Bluray at around 9gb for 45 mins. abdorefky. Intraframe means that the compression is done within the frame itself. 264/AVC standard, widely adopted for HD video. It's also known as H265 Main10, and it's known for its higher fidelity. 264 vs H. WEBRip. Interframe vs Infraframe codecs: “There are intraframe and interframe codecs. Blu-ray reviews, news, specs, ratings, screenshots. quality when adjusted for file size should be the same as they both use the h264 codec, though the 10gb file will obviously have better quality overall than the 4gb one. H265 (10bit): A version of H265. Then you're able to play H. All MiniTool Products. 265, thanks to the optimization of the H264 algorithm, can realize standard definition digital image transmission at a speed lower than 1Mbps. 53GB so that roughly a 64% reduction in filesize. Mainly, it can compress areas of 64x64 pixels into a single block, vs 16x16 for H. A Blu-Ray will always give a better image quality if encoded with the same settings regardless if it's x264 or x265 X264 vs X265 is more a matter of size. 1. x265 is a program used to encode to h265. As for the HDR part, both use HDR (as you said) so your theather H264 vs H265 . Movie details AKA:Godzilla vs. 10-20% smaller files dont come close to making up for the significantly higher encoding time and much less supported playback. Report. Something labeled as HEVC or h265 usually means it is not encoded, but a raw remux or webdl. If you have a solid tv and a great sounbar, you could use the REMUX. The short answer is The main difference between H. x264 and x265 are open source encoder implementations of the H. nick1977. 2160p UHD Blu-ray usually uses 10bit calculation precision and HEVC If you want to x264 is an encoder. Im pretty sure if someone, who knows what he is doing, would compress you 2. 264 at a lower bitrate, this was a lossy process, you are going to transcode that into HEVC. 79 GB (4 998 kb/s, x265 10 bit). 264) – An Introduction. consider both are using x264. Now for movies that's fine. I'm not sure if x264/5 use CPU and if h264/5 use GPU. First attempt was using x265 10-bit, Medium preset, crf 20. So let's say you take a raw BluRay file and encode it 3 times at consistent quality in x265, x264, and MPEG-4. " i think the general claim is that x265 will produce the same quality image compared to x264, but at half the bitrate. I just tried to find you some answers and it seems there is no major difference in video/audio quality from either source. [7] MulticoreWare made the source code for x265 publicly available on July 23, 2013. x265 outperforms libvpx for almost all X265 is known for its high compression efficiency, allowing it to produce smaller file sizes at similar quality levels compared to X264. it's just for educational purpose. [clarification needed] They can be ripped from BD25, BD50 disc (or UHD Blu-ray at higher resolutions or bitrates), and even Remuxes. Hit "RUN" to begin converting. You probably wouldn't notice a quality difference between that and a good rip to a lossier format, but potentially in the future there will be superior formats that you may wish to use and you will get better results encoding from the original than transcoding from, say, x265. HEVC vs. There is no meaningful difference at high data rates. 2. تفاوت کیفیت فیلم ها x265 چیست؟ این مفهوم مربوط به کدک ویدئوها و فشرده‌ سازی آن‌ها است. H264 vs H265(HEVC), Optimize game settings Having said that, if bandwidth and storage aren't an issue, I always prefer 'the original' x264 HD rip over a x265 re-encode for new eps, unless it's available on bluray remux and then I'll go with the x265 version because the filesize would be insane otherwise. 265 means I can fit 2,000 movies on a hard drive instead of 1,500 with h. 264 profile restrictions prevented the bitrate from going any higher, limiting the potential PSNR. X265 and x264 are not sci-fi droids from a galaxy far, far away. 18th Jun 2020 11:25 #3. Discussion Ive been out of the loop with HTPC and movies for a while and ive noticed H265 versions of movies. 265 is how each processes information and the resulting video file size and bandwidth consumption used with each standard. Which is usually higher quality, assuming similar file size and also assuming whoever ripped/encoded did a decent job, HDTV x265 or Bluray x264? And I know it doesnt matter but the x265 is 1080p and the x264 is 720p. Out with the old, in with As other posters have said, x264 and x265 are the names for the open source implementations of the two codecs. AVC. A file of exact same size and length would have double the “quality” in x265. x264 Medium imo is still king, Slow is not better. I have all of my TV shows downloaded in 720p Bluray encoded with x264. But I did try to work something out for you: In terms of speed at default settings: NVENC > x264 > x265 Generally, I've seen that x264 encodes for 1080p tend to be better than their x265 counterparts, but it's not representative for all 1080p copies out there. View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Member Is it worth to get 4k remux vs DV/HDR x265 Bluray with DTS or TrueHD Audio? Question For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. So there is no way of comparing as X264 and X265 are cpu encoding NVENC and AMD-VCE gpu encoding. H. I'd rather just buy another HDD. 4 /10 From 68k Users Creators: Ivan Raimi, Sam Raimi, Tom Spezialy Starring: Bruce Campbell, Ray Santiago, x265 builds on source code from x264, an open-source video encoder for the previous MPEG video coding standard, H. It may depend on your personal setup and preferences to get what you want from the experience. 2ch AAC and 5. However the difference should be discernible, just if you are one to pay attention to the small details a lot. Kong Blu-ray Release Date June 15, 2021. Aliens vs. 84 GB (2 330 kb/s, x264 8 bit) vs 3. They’re both video compression codecs aiming to encode video files into smaller sizes without tossing video x265 is a newer video compression standard for HEVC/H. Question So if you have a 10 GB 1080p and 20 GB 4K the difference will depend on the quality of the scaling and personal preference. 16th July 2021, 12:11 #15 | Link: tonemapped. The x264 encodes were almost completely indistinguishable to the source even when pixel peeping an individual frame flipping between the two. 264 Blu-ray (neglecting any codec differences for the moment) is that H. 1080p. At regular viewing distance on a 75 inch TV, quality x265 and x264 look the same and x265 does this with smaller file size. AKA: Kings of the Road, Untitled Ford vs. comparing the mediainfo of both x264 and x265 for movies a tvshows do you think i am loosing quality or just exchanging size Reply reply d3str0yer • heavily depends on the source and encoding settings. x265 is an open-source HEVC encoder, originally ported H. 264/5, it's just that x264/5 is the most efficient and most used by far. And the MPEG already counters with an own successor, VVC. 264/MPEG-4 AVC. Posts: 89 Don’t use x265 for 1080p, x264 is a better trade off below 4K. 264 (AVC) vs. TV eps I've taken RF to 20, and am looking at approx 1 hr encode for 40 min episode, but of course the file size is still approx 3gb per episode which is far too much when there's a lot of eps. 1 BONE Genre: Comedy/Horror IMDB Rating: 8. 265 are standards, x264 and x265 are the actual software. Yes, that's basically correct. and also if h265 is basically HEVC_NVENC for NVIDIA GPU acceleration. U‡2V Ò´Z¬‡ŒBòÚúî Yéì PÕ*!î {Uüú㯠þû¯ Á¸ ´Xmv‡Óåöx}~ÿ™Íþ lVŠ^5Ø7ž íô#d˜ aJz J¶ @– IÆ . Those x25x encoders don't scale well, so you often use tiles, which degrades the final product. 4:VP9 and X265 have a bigger advantage in picture quality over their predecessors at typical 480p/540p bitrates (800/1600) than typical 720p/1080p bitrates (3200/6400). If you want my opinion on the matter, x264 works best with 1080p and lower while x265 works best with 4K content. I intend to encode them using handbrake with x264 or x265 but I can't seem to decide on some factors. 7th May 2022 04:10 #2. Having a patent-free codec is not the only goal: If AV1 could not be more efficient than HEVC, it wouldn't pay the joined efforts of so many companies being involved. I stream to FireSticks around the house and they take it no problem. I personally don't care about the x265 vs x264 quality argument, as the space savings are well worth it (3GB vs 600MB for a single TV episode). So a video using x264@2500kbps, you would only need x265@1250kbps for the video to be of relatively equal quality. 265 video. I've read a few posts and it seems to Overall, X265 is considered the superior codec for high-quality video compression, but X264 is still widely used and supported in many devices and platforms. [3] Development on x265 began in March 2013. Looking at between 2 hrs 40 mins - 4 hours depending on length of movie, file size between 6 and 10gb. 1 AC3 for audio. If it says AVC or HEVC, then it means the video is unadulterated from the original bluray. Remuxes of 1080p blurays are either MPEG-2, VC-1 or H264. x264 vs NVENC H265 (Ampere/Turing) Just curious what people think about Blu-ray content compressed by x264 vs the same content compressed by NVENC H265 on an Ampere or Turing card like the RTX 20/30 for example. The first one is the one I usually download but it takes up a lot of space, the second one says it even supports HDR. "Slower" and beyond took forever for no discernible benefit. Results 1 to 3 of 3 BlueRay vs Web-DL x264 && AC-3 vs DTS. HEVC is h265 which is not the same as x265. BlueRay vs Web-DL x264 && AC-3 vs DTS; Closed Thread. 264 is also known as AVC, or Advanced Video Coding, this is an industry-standard for video compression that allows for the recording, compression, and distribution of digital video content. not action, more dialogue x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. Software encoding, in my experience, is still superior (when I compared x264 Medium to NVENC). x265 (release titles), with negated required exclusions of ALL x265 groups, listed out 1 by 1. 264 (which is For example, my rip of Reservoir Dogs is 1. 265 is more efficient at storing data. Here will explain the difference between H264 and H265. It's a lossy process. That is the industry standard. The difference in quality between a very fast and very slow H. Cheap Blu-ray movies and deals. The difficult case shows a fairly similar result, without major differences with the exception at the low CRF end where H. 265 encoding, offering better compression than x264, which encodes in the older AVC/H. 264 has its way of processing information, it works by processing frames of video using a block-oriented, motion Godzilla vs. lets say if a 1080p Bluray bitrate is 10mb/sec what should be a 2160p bluray bitrate. Though it's also very opinionated against x265 for 1080p content, with the argument that the quality is trash. 265/HEVC compression standard, optimizing for higher efficiency, while X264 uses the H. When comparing the 1Mbit shots, it becomes clear pretty quickly that x265 manages to preserve more detail for the parts with lots of motion. And with the help of Winxvideo AI, we can convert videos 2160 x265 vs 1080p x264 on 1080p TV . American car designer Carroll Shelby and driver Ken Miles battle corporate interference and the laws of physics to build a revolutionary race car for Ford in order to defeat Ferrari at the 24 Hours of Le Mans in 1966. The easiest way to tell the difference is by flipping between them on a computer. Ferrari Project, Go Like Hell. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. As far as I know, x265 and x264 both have no difference in quality at the same crf and preset speed. | Video Converter. This is the appeal of x265 and why it is used for UHD content like UHD BluRay discs. Otherwise you aren’t losing much. I tested with a number of movies, old and new, the results are the same. They are proudly part of LibAVCodec that is used in applications like HandBrake, FFMPEG, and VLC. [4] [5]The x265 project was initially funded We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. All UHD Bluray remuxes are H265. Reply reply Handbrake guidelines recommend an RF factor between 22 and 28 for UHD content (for x264/x265). If you interested in file sizes, x264 was 9. Convert H264 to H265. X265 encodes video using the H. ~CRF15-16 usually. Compared to x264, you'll find that x265 is much more source-dependent in its performance. 265, the standard was AVC / H. 265/HEVC compression standard, offering improved compression efficiency. 265 vs H. AV1: The game-changer in video technology. AV1 is a royalty-free, open-source video compression standard developed by the Alliance for Open Media (AOMedia), a consortium of technology companies including Google, Compared to H264, same files with same settings will take upwards of 3 times longer to compress with single pass compression, and upwards of 5 times longer with dual pass compression. Translate. Join Date: Jul 2021. I'd suggest you encode from a very high quality Blu-ray using a medium H265 preset. It is far more complicated than this and it depends from case to case, but usually blu-ray rips win when it comes to image quality x265 is a complete waste of time because of how slow it is, and it is only saving something like 15-25% of the bandwidth that x264 would at similar bitrate. U ·úëÅ¿O_í¿ØN¢ºôØ&ß Aüˆ¤%Σ(ÉæØúX”=3o?> t ¨a£ în ‚ï¹>ûÒ ² 7ˆ7LöýŸŸj_,'Q™½Hú €uï­õY$‡"µ°mZj ¶Û= Ï­ xâÃ+ü· „fÓ™ þÛ d N L”)ˆþo½iyn]Nµ½ks ô/¾\ïIC9p aPv¦ Í ÕmF q 9žŒ»Ïöý2÷ You are taking a file that was already transcoded from h. 264/AVC, which is an earlier standard commonly used for HD videos. Similarly, if you set all 3 to encode with a target file size of 5 GB, the x265 one is going to be the best quality of the 3. BluRay. So while encoding to h. Wait a bit longer. x264: Decoding Video Coding Differences. But 3Mbps x265 will look just like 3-4Mbps x264. Use ProRes, DNXHR, GoProCineform for editing. 5Mbps x264 for the similar encoding parameter. But at THAT point I can just run two h. When I compress a Blu-ray for my Plex server, I am using NVENC H265 through The other comments in this thread explain a good bit about the differences between h265, x265, and HEVC pretty well, although not the most important, another thing to note is between h265 that you mentioned and h264/AVC. Video Fanatic . 265. Reply reply Can someone point me to some frame by frame screen comparisons , proving that x265 is superior to x264 at the same file size. They may be useful for certain requirements ie real time encode where file size isn't so much an issue, but for such Given that there is the option to turn off multiplexing, it seems to me the only difference between H. AVC is short for Advanced Video Coding, and the standard was first published in 2003. The main difference is x265 In my encoding experience, you'll get the same quality at reduced size from x265. x264 files are bigger, but don't require as much CPU to decode Neither will work well as H264 and H265 are codecs that are designed for video playback at a low file size. If disk space isn't an issue, then an archival copy would be a bit-for-bit exact clone of the original disc. On my 65" OLED, I found that x265 crf18 or 19 slow was indistinguishable from the original bluray in motion, depending on the original film. 264/AVC. 264 encodes simultaneously and still get more movies encoded per unit of time compared to h. If you are simply encoding your x264 files to x265, then definitely not worth it. However at a similar encoding time the picture quality of X264/5 quality is better compared to VP8/9. Ok, so for 1080p bluray rips, what are the comparable settings when using h264? I'm going through all of my criterion collection disks and using make mkv to digitize them. H265 is the codec, X265 is your processor’s encoder which can only encode h265. I used to be against it, because I found it more limited in terms of ways to play it. Kong (eng) Movie Rating: 6. 265 encode with the same RF quality is night and day, which feels like it really defeats the purpose of the RF slider in the first place as it is far from constant. x265, 1080p. X265 is known Here’s a snapshot: x265 and libvpx demonstrate superior compression performance compared to x264, with bitrate savings reaching up to 50% especially at the higher resolutions. 264 (or HEVC vs AVC) comparison, the superiority of H. I found that NVENC H265 will do a pretty decent job but is far less efficient (needs much more bitrate to look as good). HEVC is the successor to H. In all, there’s really no big difference between PSNRs for the average case between x264 and x265 on a CRF value basis. NVENC is nvidia’s encoder which can only encode h264. x265 achieves, on average, 2x the compression of x264. 264 format. 264 BluRay to h. On some samples it's better quality on some it's worse and on some you can't really tell. 265 lies mainly in the transmission bandwidth and storage requirements. When it comes to video I personally like x265 a lot, it absolutely kills x264 at the same bit rates, but that's to be expected considering that HEVC is a much newer standard than AVC. If something is labeled as x265 is it encoded. Bluray releases are be indicated by BluRay, BDRip, or BRRip. 3 / 10 (250018) [ ] - The epic next chapter in the cinematic Monsterverse pits two of the greatest icons in motion picture history against each other--the fearsome Godzilla and the mighty Kong- Ash Vs Evil Dead S01-S03 (2015-2018) 1080p BluRay HEVC H265 5. ) but is gaining a lot of traction. For H264 use HQ 1080p30 and add trellis=1:adapt=2:me=umh into the advanced options window. Selur. 264 processes frames of video using Here will explain the difference between H264 and H265. x265 surely is not some magic wand (except on hdr 4k). GPUs with NVENC support can encode H. So its not so much about x264 vs x265 but how good is our eyes and screen we use. (High-Efficiency Video Coding), is a video compression standard that follows its predecessor, H264. To do this it employs a few tricks. 265 is obviously that H. 264, it's a hell of a lot faster to just add another hard drive to get the space back rather than waiting for the That said, I would recommend against the ultrafast or superfast settings on either x264 or x265 for general use as they do make a lot of compromises to the point where you are basically losing the benefit of using that codec. H265 is a codec, its a type of compression. The project has licensed the rights to use the x264 source code. some x265 release groups like PSA completely degrade quality to make file sizes smaller and then groups like QxR make a great effort to Blu-ray or Bluray rips (once known as BDRip) are encoded directly from a Blu-ray disc source to a 2160p, 1080p or 720p (depending on the source), and use the x264 or x265 codec. 265 video file. 264 has its way of processing information, it works by processing frames of video using a block-oriented, motion I want to download some movies I watch in 2 versions Bluray Remux h264 and h265 10bit. With x264, I would generally go with 'CRF 14/15' and 'Very Slow' preset and 'film tune'. Transparent 1080p UHD BluRay HDR x265 rips by SA89, DON, JM, Geek, BSTD, CtrlHD, ZQ, NCmt, Chotab, D-Z0N3, TnP. 265 is evident. I would go for the REMUX, maybe delete some after, or buy extra storage. 265, which is better? If you are searching for the answer, don’t miss this post. 3rd Sep 2016 11:44 #1. X264 if no other available for the above. 3: Obviously VP9 and X265 are better than VP8 and X264 at a similar file size. x265 is still far too slow on my 8C/16T i7 for me to even consider. The storage space you save can be huge. Libvpx has the same problem, and it wants multi-pass encodes to boot. However I do feel that what x265 excels at is with compression at higher resolutions (naturally) than x264. However, now there’s no issue. The x264 vs x265 at the same bitrate is a good example of 2-pass at the same bitrate, with reasonably comparable parameters (to a point). i don't know if we can compare x264 and x265 but just an estimate idea if you have experience about compare the video quality. However, the artifacts introduced by the scaling process may be The codecs and sources are two different things. 265 files freely on computer, mobile, TV and more! According to H. Disk & Data Manager; Partition In regards to Bluray releases, if it says x264 or x265, then it has been encoded from the original bluray. Now, the difference between the H. meaning, the x264 release is an encode (probably from a blu ray) and the h264 one is a webdl (from itunes, netflix, amazon or whatever). Everyone keeps saying "significantly" but when I encode with x264 and x265 i can only get about a 10-20% reduction using x265 over x264 before the x265 quality drops below the x264. If you are using software/hardware with a crappy scaler, 1080p will probably be technically better. For example, to get a same PSNR First of all don't confuse H. Put differently, you need half the bitrate in an x265 stream to achieve the same visual results as an x264 stream. More detailed, sharper image. My vote is if you absolutely feel you have to encode now, go with x265 over x264 but if you can hold off for a couple of years, then wait. Step 4. این فناوری باعث می‌شود که حجم فیلم‌ها کاهش پیدا کند و با این وجود کیفیت و گستره رنگی هم مقداری بیشتر شود. X264, while efficient, typically results in larger files than X265 for the same video quality. It still has some of that H264 color banding issues well. Ford v Ferrari subtitles. . 1080p Blu-ray usually uses 8bit calculation precision and AVC. The difference between H. Before HEVC / H. 264/5 and x264/5, they are different things. A 4k bluray would not look better if it were mastered for h. h264 is a codec. 265 (HEVC) Simplified! AVC (H. x265 has better compression at the same video quality but it's still too early to guarantee this for all scenes and situations. Introduced in 2013, H265 was designed to achieve better data compression So for example, with placebo setting, 800Kbps x265 will look like 1. Specify output folder to save H. Quote . 264/AVC and results reported from standardization showed about 50% bitrate savings for the same quality compared to H. EDIT: After the continued feeling that the x265 encodes were lower quality, i checked them out side by side with x264 as well as source as there is a noticeable degradation when converting to x265. Its main target is Ultra-HD resolutions, though. 1 so quality is still on par despite the bad encodes. 264. Thread Tools. x264 is the most established open-source software encoder for H. 264/5 is the codec (the "language" in which the video is encoded that specifies how data is stored) and x264/5 is the encoder (the "translator" that converts video from raw/one codec to a different codec). As for the HDR part, both use HDR (as you said) so your theather set-up must be able to handle it. Location: Surrey. x265 and NvEnc PSNR versus bitrate x265 and NvEnc SSIM versus bitrate x265 and NvEnc VMAF versus bitrate So first take out, is that SSIM, PSNR and VMAF are not consistent within each-others. vxaosp eydb cnq vupapw fkel hkhbp lxaz rdkkw lqzkxkp dfbg