Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time sample. Sincerely, [Your name].

Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time sample I'm an Assistant Professor and I get far more review requests than I could ever handle, at the same time that my institutional service responsibilities are ramping up (fewer T-T profs around my I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. Some do it in time, some start a day before the deadline, some need a number of reminders after the deadline, After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I have not had any news about it since. This change has occurred For more experienced authors, if you’re a reluctant reviewer who doesn’t respond in time, and may not submit review reports on time, you may not expect that others will do otherwise for you. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. " It's a s**t show. Do not email to ask about It is also possible that the handling editor did find suitable reviewers, but they were not available to review your paper at the time. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. The journal review process. Still the status is same. If there is no update by then, you may consider writing to the editor about it. So Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 I just thought after all reviewer scores, I will disagree. I want to know how long will this status last. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. However, What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar, 2020 . Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). Now this is the fourth month and the status is still the same. . This change has occurred Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that Anybody know how long it should take a journal to assign reviewers to an article? I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment," even though authors are encouraged to suggest the potential reviewers (which I Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. To check the status of your submission in o I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 15-6. selecting. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. Thank you for your time. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. 1 For papers that do advance to publication, peer review provides a final opportunity for improvements, such as the addition of key details to help I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. There is no set time for this to take. Objective Peer review frequently follows a process where reviewers first provide initial reviews, authors respond to these reviews, then reviewers update their reviews based on the authors’ response. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. 3 answers. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. After making the necessary changes, I submitted the manuscript. First, Provide two samples for reference: Paper 1: Application of data fusion in Intelligent Transportation Systems your first trial also took such a long time, but the second trial was relatively faster. I think it seems a long time for this step. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. The status of my submission changed from "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision" on November 8 and it has been constant since then. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. After several weeks I received an email saying that"Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be accepted for publication should you be prepared to incorporate minor revisions". Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. As the Editor has Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. What can this mean? The platform is The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. Reviewer assignments (i. However, I just noticed that the status of my Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. My paper underwent a revision. while the editor selects reviewers and the reviewers start and complete their reviews, In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Indicates that invitations have already been sent to reviewers but that reviewers have not yet responded. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. The EiC at that time said they'll look So, while the final decision may take some time, you may have some reason to be hopeful. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. The EiC at that time said they'll look Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. Role of the reviewer. Can you please guide what obstacles I have crossed and what is 2023. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. 11 Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Is this a long time to wait for the scores? Should I communicate with the editor, or is this a bad sign? Asked on 22 Mar, 2021 . How long I should wait for the final verdict? Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. Is long period a good or bad sign? I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. This change has occurred Ex. I have to leave the institute within 2 months. Awaiting ME I submitted a research paper to a journal. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". We, the Associate Editors and Editors-in-Chief are very appreciative of the time and effort put Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. The status of the paper changed several times. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC The average review period of the target journal that I submitted is two weeks, and it usually takes about a month to get the first revision. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. There is mixed evidence regarding whether this process is useful, including frequent anecdotal complaints that reviewers insufficiently update their scores. By: Alison McGonagle-O’Connell, Marketing Manager, Aries Systems Corporation A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. Needless to say, I won't be submitting to SF any time soon, 6 years ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 2 NO GOOD! Reply. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. 2023. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Now it is almost 3 weeks. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. I submitted a manuscript to Springer Journal. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. In the first notification, I got a major revision. 5 months with no change in status. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. If the paper was sent back for revision, the I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. That is absolutely ridiculous to charge that much and take that long to send it out. Answer. the second one was 'awaiting eic assignment' and now it says 'awaiting ae assignment'. Sincerely, [Your name]. However, I submitted the paper at the end of May and the status is still “under review. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. In this study, Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. I checked the status now: Reviewer 1 has already finished review in the end of May, and reviewer 2 approved it in Please help me out! I submitted a manuscript to a SCOPUS indexed journal some months ago. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under Research on psycho educational group treatment for long covid patients I submitted a paper to some journal. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. F40Model Year: 2019 + Previous Generations; F20 / F21Model Year: 2012 - 2018 East coast deliveries are usually no more than a week from time the car leaves Greer, SC. Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. Nisar Ahmed, it is very frustrating for a researcher to wait for such long time. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. ” Final thoughts. As it has been only two weeks since you submitted your paper and only one week since the status changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment,’ you may need to wait for some time, let’s say, two-three weeks, for the next status update. Post I have submitted a manuscript to the ScholarOne journal and the first status was about admin checklist. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. For more experienced authors, if you’re a reluctant reviewer who doesn’t respond in time, and may not submit review reports on time, you may not expect that others will do otherwise for you. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Some editors keep a paper for a long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a decision on I submitted a paper to an internationally reputed journal. :-) Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). I submitted a manuscript to a journal in December of 2021. It has been 1. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number of publications that those grad students and post-docs could amass. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. After one week with the editor, the I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. The bad sign stems from the fact that it really shouldn't take seven months to find a reviewer. So, why has it returned to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? Hope this helps. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Follow this Question. Improve this answer. A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. 1. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. This model can capture the diverse nature of reviewers and papers’ research directions and consider the influence of time on the reviewer’s research direction. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). (date). However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". How long should I wait for a response from the journal? you could wait for some time to know the decision. Can I send a email to AE? My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. The status will change to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" then probably go through a couple more cycles of "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision after a long time). 3. I have written to (name) on (date) and (date), but have not heard back from him/her. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. 6. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it Initially your manuscript will go through stages such as “Awaiting Admin Checklist” and/or “Awaiting Editor Assignment” depending on how new submissions are initially checked You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. " I have two doubts. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. My paper submissions (all to the Astrophysical Journal) have all been followed up by the editor within a week of initial submission. Logging In 1. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Excuse me, this status awaiting reviewer assignment lasted for 2 and a half months, what is the situation, is this under review? - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Forum but this time the speed can exceed my expectations. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. If that is the case, then the paper will go under review again and the time taken can be much longer. Suddenly, the status has been changed to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for the second time. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Occasional transport delays happen. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". The quality of peer review, and consequently the published research, depends to a | Find, read and cite all the research you The assignment of appropriate reviewers to academic articles, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP), has become a crucial issue in academia. Can you tell me what sort of time frame to keep in mind as I am awaiting news of my submission? Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some time and then move back to “With Editor. Assignment to a Referee and the Review The SE will read your paper, draw up a list of prospective referees, and recruit a reviewer for your paper. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . 1 Answer to this question. thanks a lot. While ther After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". ” How long do I have to submit my revision? X. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Waiting time. If the reviewer does not respond to the invitation, that is a strong indication that the reviewer is unavailable for review or is unwilling to review. A month is a long time to go with no word. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are Editor here. The status of my paper How long from “awaiting carrier assignment? Bimmerpost ☰ Model Selection. Here are some suggestions for additional potential colleagues who would be in a position to provide suitable peer review. I have two questions. e. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Hi. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. but only invite a few at a time. If one reviewer did not return a review, it is only natural to ask for a new reviewer's opinion. In this paper, we analyze current problems in reviewer assignment system and further propose a time-aware and topic-based reviewer assignment model. Share. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. Answer: The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. 21, awaiting AE decision. All content in this area was uploaded by Xiquan Zhao on Nov 20, 2022 5 SAGE Track Login Page Login Page Tabs Log In: The page to log into SAGE Track and access additional resources. View. In such cases, the AE should remove the nonresponsive reviewer from the list of invited reviewers and select additional reviewers, including assigning him/herself as reviewer in exceptional cases. subject=status report of (paper)? // "I'm concerned about my (date) submission, which was confirmed on (date). Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The fact that the editor-in-Chief confers with another editor could mean that they confer whether or not the existing single review is sufficient. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. Sorry! nothing found for. " Does this Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. So your manuscript is one step closer to a final decision. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This seems very slow and inefficient- to leave the paper sitting there for two This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. 0 of 0. This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. In case if it gets rejected after 8-9 months, it will add up to the chaos of the author. The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). This is a long manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review As long as you do it in a professional manner, space your requests appropriately over time and are reasonable about timelines, then there shouldn't be a reason for journal staff to react negatively about this. “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Create An Account: The page to begin creating a new account in SAGE Track. In general, editors and journals Why is the status of my manuscript showing "Awaiting Reviewers Assignment" and "Awaiting EiC Decision" at the same time? How long should I wait for a response from the journal? It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. This change has occurred I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. This is the way to If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Just want to know what you think based on So, waiting for a long time to hear from the Editor after reviews have My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review Popular Articles. Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days However I submitted on the 16th September, and the paper still shows 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment'. I submitted a paper to a journal. This change has occurred 2. After three months I contacted the editor and s/he informed me that the review is still going on. It is a bit expensive for the page fee of 350 dollars/page, but it is also happy to pay for the extra page. The publishing time is too long, starting from 3 months. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. It's been a month since the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Does anyone have any idea why Introduction. Awaiting Reviewer Scores I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. All the best for your submission! Answered by Editage Insights on 21 Dec, 2021 . I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. The EiC at that time said they'll look PDF | Peer review is an integral component of scientific research. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. Okay, it has been sent for review again. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. " Should I expect a Revised on September 19, 2022, and currently "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. ” It has been almost 2 months now. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Within a couple of days the status changed to "assigning for review". Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to As can be inferred from Fig. After incorporating the comments of reviewers, I resubmitted the paper. Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching note and provide the journal editor with detailed and useful comments. It went through all stages up to the Editor in Charge Decision. Understanding customized editorial statuses can help authors understand which stage a submission is at within the peer-review process. After that communication with the editor, neither the editor nor the handling editor return I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. In general, editors and journals may want more than you to have a quick decision back to you, as the journal indices can be affected, which in turn may affect authors selecting the journal, and, The difference between "reviewer invited" and "under review" is simply that in the second case, at least one invited reviewer has agreed to review it. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. 6. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). As for time, I am not sure why you question a few days for a decision. If this makes sense, My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. Take time to reflect Put the comments to one side for a few days, then come back to them. " If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. I have It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. However, I definitely remember the last two: The reviewer of a good paper should indicate why it should be accepted, just as the reviewer of a bad paper should indicate why it should be rejected. Skip to My manuscript suddenly went from "Awaiting Final Decision" back to "Awaiting Reviewer After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. I didnt see the "under review After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Journal peer review is a critical part of the scientific process. My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are move on to a stage such as “Awaiting Recommendation” and/or “Awaiting Decision” and it generally won’t be long before a decision is sent to you. Reviewer Support. Peer reviewers judge which papers merit publication based on the soundness of the methods and other criteria, such as novelty and significance. You may suggest possible referees, especially if the subject addressed by your paper is a very specialized one, but usually we prefer to select one independently. Does it mean the work will be Dear Dr. Go to your SAGE Track journal’s login page I would like to inquire about the status of our submitted manuscript since it has now been [insert the amount of time that has passed]. Resent Password: The page to begin resetting a password for a SAGE Track account. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. Is it normal? Also, I see that it's been a while that the status has remained at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. sbslqf jkdpvb uekj jjcxb rtob mqdw irwn fzlf zgs mvg